<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Faith At Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faithatlaw.com/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faithatlaw.com</link>
	<description>Technology, Small Business, Entertainment Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Be Fooled (Domain Name Registration)</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2012/02/07/dont-be-fooled-domain-name-registration/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2012/02/07/dont-be-fooled-domain-name-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithatlaw.com/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my clients forwarded to me an email he received regarding the renewal of his domain name.  The email had the appearance of an invoice for the renewal.  The problem?  The invoice was not from my client&#8217;s domain name registrar, but from a vendor that wants my client to transfer his domain away from [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2012/02/07/dont-be-fooled-domain-name-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Contracts for Businesses</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/09/entertainment-contracts-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/09/entertainment-contracts-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entertainment businesses operate like many other business enterprises: ultimately, the business must make a profit in order to survive.  One way to help sustain and protect an entertainment business is to document the business relationships through written entertainment contracts between parties that participate in the providing of services to clients. Ownership Contracts For example, if [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/09/entertainment-contracts-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Struggle Over Privacy Online</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/07/the-struggle-over-privacy-online/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/07/the-struggle-over-privacy-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more data is being collected and stored in more and more data centers all over the world as the use and functionality of the internet expands.  Sites like Facebook now have in excess of 800 million users, half of which are active in any particular day.  An almost countless amount of information and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/12/07/the-struggle-over-privacy-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Will Problems</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/11/28/common-will-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/11/28/common-will-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A will is a document that describes how its author (the &#8220;testator&#8221;) wishes his or her assets to be distributed to others at death.  Wills are a practical necessity for people that own real or personal property.  These documents, when properly drafted and executed, provide for an orderly distribution of property to survivors of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/11/28/common-will-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unauthorized Practice of Law &amp; LegalZoom</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/31/unauthorized-practice-of-law-legalzoom/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/31/unauthorized-practice-of-law-legalzoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LegalZoom is a national provider of online legal forms that markets to the general public.  You may have seen an advertisement with the famous attorney Robert Shapiro (a founder of the company) telling you that LegalZoom can help you form a company or write a will at a relatively low flat rate.  LegalZoom is controversial.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/31/unauthorized-practice-of-law-legalzoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Information Exchange &amp; Sharing Your Health Data</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/health-information-exchange/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/health-information-exchange/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ARRA (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) provides incentives for qualifying health care providers that implement health IT systems in the next few years.  Among the requirements for receiving the incentive is that the provider can demonstrate the health IT system can “is connected in a manner that provides, in accordance with law and standards [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/health-information-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Implementing Your Electronic Health Record System</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/implementing-your-electronic-health-record-system/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/implementing-your-electronic-health-record-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Health IT has been put back into the forefront of the Obama national health care initiative, in part because of financial incentives built into the ARRA for health care providers that implement and meaningfully use a health technology system in the next few years. The cost savings are premised in part on the success of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/implementing-your-electronic-health-record-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greening IT Through Virtualization</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/greening-it-through-virtualization/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/greening-it-through-virtualization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology continues to evolve, providing people with new functionality, features, information, and entertainment.  According to Ray Kurzweil, a number of metrics for computer performance and capacity indicate that our technology is expanding at a linear or exponential rate.  Sadly, the physical manifestations of technology are also helping to destroy the planet and poison our clean [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/greening-it-through-virtualization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starbucks v. Wolfe Borough&#8217;s Coffee</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/starbucks-v-wolfe-boroughs-coffee/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/starbucks-v-wolfe-boroughs-coffee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starbucks is a well known, international purveyor of coffee products, with thousands of stores throughout the world.  Starbucks v. Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 01 Civ. 5981 (LTS)(THK), 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35578 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 23, 2005) (Starbucks I).  Starbucks Corporation was formed in 1985 in Washington State, after the original founders had been in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/starbucks-v-wolfe-boroughs-coffee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Standards: Massachusetts and HIPAA</title>
		<link>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/security-standards-massachusetts-and-hipaa/</link>
		<comments>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/security-standards-massachusetts-and-hipaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.faithatlaw.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009, Massachusetts become the first state to mandate that those storing personal information of residents of Massachusetts comply with specific security practices as required  under 201 CMR § 17.00.  These standards went into effect on January 1, 2010.  The following is an analysis of how the Massachusetts legislation lines up with the existing HIPAA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://faithatlaw.com/index.php/2011/08/29/security-standards-massachusetts-and-hipaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

